Student Peng Zhang traces cracks
in the column during a strength test in UBC Okanagan’s Applied
Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures.
Credit: Image courtesy of University of British Columbia Okanagan campus
A recent study by researchers at UBC's
Okanagan campus examined a variety of bridge types along with design
requirements under the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. The study
concludes that while bridges are being built to withstand the force of
an earthquake -- the bridges are being overbuilt and driving up
unnecessary construction expenses.
At the design stage, engineers determine a bridge's seismic
performance and predict damages -- if an earthquake occurs -- by
calculating strains the material can withstand, explains UBC professor
Shahria Alam. They must also make calculations for the probable
post-earthquake functionality of the bridge.
"We've determined it's very unnecessary to design a structure with that much reinforcement," says Alam, the study's author. "The code calls for a lot of material and the size of the columns and beams are simply too large."
Alam, who teaches civil engineering at UBC's Okanagan campus, explains there are a lot of materials that go into bridges, and for years the common thought has been to add more steel reinforcement to make them stronger. However, his research and structural testing in his lab and on a bridge pier in the Lower Mainland, is telling a different story.
Under Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, load, durability and seismic design -- how movement during an earthquake will be dispersed within the structure so it will remain standing -- are all part of the basics when bridges are planned.
"Public safety is the most important aspect and we have to build structures so they do not collapse during an earthquake," he says. "What we're saying now is that we should be building structures that not only save lives, but we should also be saving the structure itself."
As part of their research, Alam and his team have been testing shape memory alloy reinforced, and post-tensioned bridge piers, in the Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures (ALAMS) on UBC's Okanagan campus. Alam's team tested the seismic performance of such structural elements.
"We've proposed target residual drift-based criteria for performance-based seismic design of bridges that have self-centering capability," says Alam. "It is very expensive to build a bridge to a certain standard, and then you cannot afford to demolish and replace it. Hence, new structural systems can be designed by following the proposed guideline. Thus, engineers can build almost damage free bridges even after a major earthquake."
Watch a related video: https://youtu.be/wmo96WpuPek
"We've determined it's very unnecessary to design a structure with that much reinforcement," says Alam, the study's author. "The code calls for a lot of material and the size of the columns and beams are simply too large."
Alam, who teaches civil engineering at UBC's Okanagan campus, explains there are a lot of materials that go into bridges, and for years the common thought has been to add more steel reinforcement to make them stronger. However, his research and structural testing in his lab and on a bridge pier in the Lower Mainland, is telling a different story.
Under Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, load, durability and seismic design -- how movement during an earthquake will be dispersed within the structure so it will remain standing -- are all part of the basics when bridges are planned.
"Public safety is the most important aspect and we have to build structures so they do not collapse during an earthquake," he says. "What we're saying now is that we should be building structures that not only save lives, but we should also be saving the structure itself."
As part of their research, Alam and his team have been testing shape memory alloy reinforced, and post-tensioned bridge piers, in the Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures (ALAMS) on UBC's Okanagan campus. Alam's team tested the seismic performance of such structural elements.
"We've proposed target residual drift-based criteria for performance-based seismic design of bridges that have self-centering capability," says Alam. "It is very expensive to build a bridge to a certain standard, and then you cannot afford to demolish and replace it. Hence, new structural systems can be designed by following the proposed guideline. Thus, engineers can build almost damage free bridges even after a major earthquake."
Watch a related video: https://youtu.be/wmo96WpuPek
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of British Columbia Okanagan campus. Original written by Patty Wellborn. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Materials provided by University of British Columbia Okanagan campus. Original written by Patty Wellborn. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Journal Reference:
- A. H. M. Muntasir Billah, A.M.ASCE; and M. Shahria Alam, M.ASCE. Performance-Based Seismic Design of Shape Memory Alloy–Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers. II: Methodology and Design Example. Journal of Structural Engineering, January 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment