Significance Statement
Overloading of concrete structures leads
to short lifetime of structure or even collapse during extreme cases.
Rehabilitation of damaged concrete structures in order to meet
requirements after carrying high permissible load is a better
alternative to demolishing and rebuilding due to present economic
climate condition.
Ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composite UHPFRCC
have been successfully applied in retrofitting or strengthening of
reinforced concrete beams. CARDIFRC, one of the techniques of UHPFRCC
has benefitting features such as tensile strength, stiffness and
coefficient of linear thermal expansion which are comparable with that
of parent member material.
However, CARDIFRC requires high cement
content which does not enhance concrete properties but increases
emission of greenhouse gases contributing to global warming. In order to
overcome this problem, a green-USM-reinforced concrete which has lesser
cement content (< 360Kg/m3) compared to 744Kg/m3 of CARDIFRC is currently being developed in Universiti Sains Malaysia USM.
Research conducted by Dr. Aldahdooh and colleagues expanded their findings on green-USM-reinforced concrete GUSMRC as a new green retrofitting material. The work published in Composite Structures
examined its flexural behaviors such as crack development, crack modes,
flexural capacity and deflection capacity of a reinforced concrete
before and after retrofitting
Results from crack development in
reinforced concrete beams before retrofitting showed that recorded
failure load of three beams of G(0) members was between the range of
37KN to 39.68KN and their failure mode was due to diagonal tension. The
third beam reached the highest load of 39.68KN (cycle 16).
The beam A-T20-R20KN-B1 was selected
with shear tension failure as the worst failure case. The beam failed
when load reached the ultimate capacity of 55.25KN (cycle 22). Compared
with results of reinforced concrete before retrofitting, the increase in
ultimate failure load of the beam reached 41.3%.
Difference between failure load capacity
of both GUSMRC and CARDIFRC were insignificant and at 30KN and 40KN,
beams retrofitted with CARDIFRC strips were slightly larger than those
of beams retrofitted with GUSMRC concrete strips in terms of ratio of
mid-span deflection of beams after retrofitting to before retrofitting
This study proves that GUSMRC can effectively serve as a good retrofitting material.
Figure Legend :Procedures for bonding the retrofitting GUSMRC strips.
(a)1st step (b) 2nd step
(a)1st step (b) 2nd step
(C) Last step for this type of retrofitting
(d) Last step for this type of retrofitting
Figure Legend 2: Casting of GUSMRC strips for retrofitting
Figure Legend 3: Steel fiber distribution inside GUSMRC strips
Journal Reference
Majed. A.A. Aldahdooh1 , Muhamad Bunnori2, A. Megat Johari2, Ahmad Jamrah1, Ali Alnuaimi3. Retrofitting of damaged reinforced concrete beams with a new green cementitious composites material, Composite Structures, Volume 142, 2016, Pages 27–34.
No comments:
Post a Comment