Significance Statement
Increased discharge of greenhouse gases
is now a bigger menace to the environment especially in building sector
and thermal bridges which causes adverse heat transfer leading to
reduction in the insulation performance of the buildings. So,
indispensable green building policies have started preferring zero
energy utilization methodologies thereby resulting in improving
insulation performance.
There have been lots of studies about
the heat losses through different thermal bridges in combination with
several walls to evaluate the energy utilization and the insulation
performance.
Lately, curtain walls have admired as
the envelope of high-rise buildings. For curtain walls, metals with a
low thermal resistance are used for the main components. In many
countries, including Korea, the non-vision parts of curtain walls are
vital to meet a required U-factor (thermal transmittance) of walls, as
spelled out in the building codes. Curtain walls for reducing thermal
bridges are needed to deal with the enriched insulation performance
design criteria to be realistic.
Henceforth researchers led by Professor
Seung-Yeong Song from Ewha Womans University in South Korea suggested
three possible cases that substitutes thermal bridges in steel truss
metal panel curtain walls. In this metal panels are counterfeited by
covering six faces of insulation with metal. Then they are fixed to the
truss and they are compared for its economic feasibility and thermal
functioning through three-dimensional steady-state heat transfer
simulations.
In prevailing system, Bracket-based
fixing method is extensively preferred which makes construction more
convenient. The metal panels can be fixed at only two points when the
size of horizontal metal panel is less than two meters. If it exceeds
two meters, then the metal panel can be fixed at more than three points.
For these types, both vertical and horizontal trusses are needed. For
steel truss metal panel curtain wall systems, the main linear thermal
bridges occur at the vertical and horizontal joints between the metal
panels, where the insulation is non-continuous.
Slim metal panels (Vacuum insulation
panels) used for designing purpose are susceptible by sharp objects. In
order to protect and assuage linear thermal bridges at the joints,
insulation is done by 2 layers by phenolic foam and vacuum insulation
panel. The front and rear surfaces of a metal panel are made of steel
sheet. The upper, lower, right, and left edges of the metal panel are
formed of aluminum moldings in which there is a groove for inserting the
bracket. Polyurethane thermal breaker is amalgamated into the aluminum
molding.
The researchers suggested the first
possibility case which is described as follow: The length of the
prevailing aluminum molding is reduced by one-third to lighten linear
thermal bridges resulting from the aluminum moldings at the joints
between metal panels. The remaining two-third of the metal panel
thickness was fitted with a PVC-foam pad to ensure air-tightness between
the metal panels and to prevent the exposure of insulation in the metal
panel.
In the second possibility case, a
thermally broken bracket replaces the aluminum bracket of first case.
The difference between the thermally broken bracket and the aluminum
bracket is the polyurethane thermal breaker which is not inserted into
the thermally broken bracket. It will reduce the trappings of point
thermal bridges caused by brackets.
In the case of third possibility, its
aluminum molding is same as to second possibility except that a
polyurethane thermal breaker is inserted into the molding to further
reduce the heat loss. They used Midas Information technology – a
structural analysis program to investigate the structural performance of
the thermally broken bracket. The insulation performance is evaluated
using a three-dimensional steady-state heat transfer simulation program
which is used to solve heat equation.
Finally, after analysis of annual energy
costs, evaluation of economic feasibility the validity of the simulated
results was investigated by comparing the authors’ alternatives and
existed cases to the mock-up test results. In addition to this, heating
and cooling energy uses were also calculated by considering the
efficiency of the heating and cooling system. With all these analyses,
this study finally brought up a beneficial and green zero energy
building infrastructure designs that reduces linear bridges, which is
feasible and cost effective.
Journal Reference
Jin-Hee Song , Jae-Han Lim , Seung-Yeong Song. Evaluation of alternatives for reducing thermal bridges in metal panelcurtain wall systems. Energy and Buildings,Volume 127, 2016, Pages 138–158.Department of Architectural Engineering, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, South Korea
No comments:
Post a Comment